JRS report denounces inhumane treatment of asylum seekers at Napier Barracks in Kent
The move came despite significant criticism of facilities at the site, including a judgment from the High Court declaring them inadequate, and the Home Office guilty of employing unlawful practices. Also, according to the Court, the use of emergency powers bypassed consultation with local community that such an extension would normally require.
Titled Napier Barracks: the inhumane reality, the JRS report is based on in-depth conversations held by its staff with people who had been at the camp in 2022, after the High Court judgment, when these criticalities were supposed to have been addressed.
The Jesuit Refugee Service ran an outreach service to Napier for two years from October 2020.
What emerged on the ground, says the summary, “was deeply troubling”: the site was bleak and rundown, the setting was securitised, the accommodation was crowded, taking a serious toll on residents’ mental health.
Key findings from those conversations include: people being routinely brought to the camp without their prior knowledge, causing them deep anxiety; harsh military and prison-like living conditions, with overcrowding and no privacy; serious failures in screening for vulnerabilities, namely survivors of both trafficking and torture who continued to be placed and remain there; barriers to accessing healthcare, and lack of legal advice. Also, safety issues have not been addressed after a serious fire broke out at the camp at the end of January 2021.
In light of these findings, the 35-pages report urges the government “to immediately and permanently close” the Napier Barracks, and abandon its plans for greater use of large-scale institutional asylum accommodation and, instead, to provide asylum seekers “with safe and dignified accommodation within British communities” which, it says “is better for the mental health of people seeking asylum, and for communities as a whole” and “supports integration”.
It was published amid growing criticism against PM Rishi Sunak’s New Plan for Immigration which includes banning illegal migrants making dangerous journeys across the English Channel on small boats from entering the UK in the future and deporting them either back to their own country or to so-called safe third countries.
The measure has raised many ethical, along with legal questions regarding its compliance with international law, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the Refugee Convention, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Global Compact on Refugees, and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.
Over 60 British NGOs, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green MPs and academics have written to Sunak to ask him to withdraw the proposed legislation, saying it would cause unnecessary deaths and would fuel modern slavery. Among the signatories are “Anti-Slavery International” and Amnesty International UK refugee & migrant rights programme director Steve Valdez-Symonds.
Reporting by By Lisa Zengarini
________________
SOURCE: